Sg. Humiston et al., DECISION RULES FOR PREDICTING VACCINATION STATUS OF PRESCHOOL-AGE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS, The Journal of pediatrics, 123(6), 1993, pp. 887-892
We produced and tested rules to predict undervaccination among prescho
ol-age emergency department (ED) patients. Data were gathered on demog
raphics, vaccination status, health status, and health care utilizatio
n from parents, ED physicians, and ED charts at an urban teaching hosp
ital in Rochester, N.Y. Primary core charts were reviewed to verify va
ccination status. Using recursive partitioning, we developed decision
rules to predict undervaccination. Decision rules were developed on a
sample of 602 ED patients 4 to 48 months of age and then prospectively
tested on 1832 ED patients aged 6 to 36 months. Factors associated wi
th undervaccination for any vaccine included parental report of vaccin
ation delay (odds ratio = 8.1; p<0.001), inability to report the recei
pt of the appropriate number of vaccines (odds ratio = 4.5; p<0.001),
lack of health insurance (odds ratio = 3.6, p<0.001), elapsed time sin
ce the lost visit to primary care provider (p<0.001), household size (
p<0.001), and maternal age (p<0.01). Eight decision rules were produce
d that varied in their number of questions (one to six), sensitivity (
0.27 to 0.87), and specificity (0.54 to 0.98). No single rule was both
highly sensitive and highly specific. The rules sensitivities and spe
cificities were similar for the validation sample of 1832 patients. Th
us a decision rule could not be produced that was both sensitive and s
pecific. Identification of undervaccinated children by means of inform
ation available at an ED visit is inherently difficult. Interventions
in the ED may be inefficient unless better methods of assessing vaccin
ation status can be developed.