Sa. Gunter et al., FORAGE INTAKE AND DIGESTION BY CATTLE GRAZING MIDGRASS PRAIRIE RANGELAND OR SIDEOATS GRAMA SWEETCLOVER PASTURE, Journal of animal science, 71(12), 1993, pp. 3432-3441
In mid-May, beef cattle fitted with esophageal (four steers/pasture) o
r ruminal and duodenal cannulas (six heifers/pasture; 274 +/- 6 kg BW
+/- SE) grazed midgrass prairie (excellent range condition; PRAIRIE) o
r a seeded mixture of sideoats grama (48% of pasture DM) and sweetclov
er (6% of pasture DM; Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr./Melilotus
officinalis [L.] Lam.; PASTURE). Masticate NDF, ADF, and in vitro OM d
isappearance did not differ ( P > .11) between forage types (average =
66.6, 36.1, and 58.8% of OM). Only N differed (P = .02) between PRAIR
IE (2.1) and PASTURE (2.4% of OM). Extents of in situ OM and N disappe
arance were greater (P < .05) and rate of N disappearance between 12 a
nd 36 h was slower (P < .10) from PRAIRIE than from PASTURE masticate.
Based on in situ data, the ruminally degraded N:ruminally degraded OM
(grams/kilogram) ratio differed (P < .05) between PRAIRIE (22) and PA
STURE (25). Ruminal ammonia N concentration (milligrams/deciliter) was
less (p < .02) for PRAIRIE (2.8) than for PASTURE (3.8). Forage OM in
take and fecal OM output did not differ (P > .72; average = 8,207 and
3,380 g/d), but duodenal OM flow tended (P = .13) to be greater (PRAIR
IE = 4,892, PASTURE = 5,170 g/d) in cattle grazing PASTURE. Apparent a
nd true ruminal OM digestion did not differ between forage types (P >
.18; average = 38.3 and 48.5%). Nitrogen intake, nonammonia N, and for
age N flow at the duodenum were greater (P < .04) for PASTURE (198 vs
171, 242 vs 210, and 162 vs 135 g/d) than for PRAIRIE. Microbial N flo
w (average = 78 g/d) and microbial efficiency (average = 20 g of micro
bial N/kg of OM truly fermented) did not differ (P > .25) between fora
ge types. Apparent and true ruminal N digestion did not differ (P > .6
5; average = -26.6 and 19.3%) between forage types. Flow of nonammonia
N was in excess relative to digestible OM intake; hence, digestible O
M intake seemed to be first-limiting for performance by cattle grazing
either forage type.