FORAGE INTAKE AND DIGESTION BY CATTLE GRAZING MIDGRASS PRAIRIE RANGELAND OR SIDEOATS GRAMA SWEETCLOVER PASTURE

Citation
Sa. Gunter et al., FORAGE INTAKE AND DIGESTION BY CATTLE GRAZING MIDGRASS PRAIRIE RANGELAND OR SIDEOATS GRAMA SWEETCLOVER PASTURE, Journal of animal science, 71(12), 1993, pp. 3432-3441
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
71
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
3432 - 3441
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1993)71:12<3432:FIADBC>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
In mid-May, beef cattle fitted with esophageal (four steers/pasture) o r ruminal and duodenal cannulas (six heifers/pasture; 274 +/- 6 kg BW +/- SE) grazed midgrass prairie (excellent range condition; PRAIRIE) o r a seeded mixture of sideoats grama (48% of pasture DM) and sweetclov er (6% of pasture DM; Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr./Melilotus officinalis [L.] Lam.; PASTURE). Masticate NDF, ADF, and in vitro OM d isappearance did not differ ( P > .11) between forage types (average = 66.6, 36.1, and 58.8% of OM). Only N differed (P = .02) between PRAIR IE (2.1) and PASTURE (2.4% of OM). Extents of in situ OM and N disappe arance were greater (P < .05) and rate of N disappearance between 12 a nd 36 h was slower (P < .10) from PRAIRIE than from PASTURE masticate. Based on in situ data, the ruminally degraded N:ruminally degraded OM (grams/kilogram) ratio differed (P < .05) between PRAIRIE (22) and PA STURE (25). Ruminal ammonia N concentration (milligrams/deciliter) was less (p < .02) for PRAIRIE (2.8) than for PASTURE (3.8). Forage OM in take and fecal OM output did not differ (P > .72; average = 8,207 and 3,380 g/d), but duodenal OM flow tended (P = .13) to be greater (PRAIR IE = 4,892, PASTURE = 5,170 g/d) in cattle grazing PASTURE. Apparent a nd true ruminal OM digestion did not differ between forage types (P > .18; average = 38.3 and 48.5%). Nitrogen intake, nonammonia N, and for age N flow at the duodenum were greater (P < .04) for PASTURE (198 vs 171, 242 vs 210, and 162 vs 135 g/d) than for PRAIRIE. Microbial N flo w (average = 78 g/d) and microbial efficiency (average = 20 g of micro bial N/kg of OM truly fermented) did not differ (P > .25) between fora ge types. Apparent and true ruminal N digestion did not differ (P > .6 5; average = -26.6 and 19.3%) between forage types. Flow of nonammonia N was in excess relative to digestible OM intake; hence, digestible O M intake seemed to be first-limiting for performance by cattle grazing either forage type.