S. Jackson et al., THE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL-CARCINOMA WITHIN THE SOUTH-WEST REGION OF ENGLAND, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 104(2), 1997, pp. 140-144
Objective 1. To audit the management of cervical carcinoma in the Sout
h West Region with the aim of identifying and addressing deficiencies.
2. To determine whether recent NHS restructuring has affected the pro
vision of cancer care. Design Retrospective review of hospital case no
tes. Setting All hospitals in the South West Region of England. Popula
tion Three hundred and twenty-four women with a diagnosis of cervical
carcinoma: 191 were diagnosed in 1989 and 133 in 1993. Main outcome me
asures Documentation of patient assessment and management. Results The
re was a mean delay of 17 days (range 0-66) from cervical smear to cyt
ology report and 34 days (range 1-380) from general practitioner refer
ral to attendance at a hospital clinic. Overall, 175 women (54%) had e
vidence of cytological assessment prior to treatment and 137 (42%) had
a colposcopic assessment; 49% had cytological assessment and 37% had
colposcopy in 1989, compared with 60% and 50%, respectively, in 1993.
Excluding 49 cases of micro-invasive carcinoma, 238 case notes (86%) c
ontained evidence of clinical examination; 195 women (71%) had had an
examination under anaesthesia, 115 (42%) a chest radiograph, 123 (45%)
an intravenous urogram or renal ultrasound, and 92 (33%) cystoscopy.
One hundred and forty-seven women (53%) had FIGO staging recorded in t
he notes. As first line treatment, 69 had conservative surgery (39 for
Stage IA), 138 had radiotherapy, and 107 had radical surgery. Ten had
radical surgery for Stage IA but eight had a > 3 mm invasion or lymph
atic/vascular spread. Thirty-one had Stage IB treated with radiotherap
y of whom 14 were younger than 50 years of age. Following radical surg
ery 30% had evidence of sampling greater than or equal to 10 nodes, an
d 9% had tumour extending to the resection margins. Conclusions Record
keeping was inadequate but appeared to indicate inconsistent cytologi
cal, clinical, colposcopic and radiological assessment, leading to ina
ppropriate clinical delays and conservative surgery. Radical surgery o
ften appeared inadequate, but poor node sampling rates may also reflec
t insufficient histopathological preparation or reporting. There was a
reduction in the number of new cases of cervical carcinoma diagnosed
in 1993, perhaps reflecting an observed increase in cytological survei
llance. No other alterations in clinical practice were observed over t
he four-year period. We feel it is imperative to standardise assessmen
t throughout the region with a minimum clinical and histopathological
dataset.