G. Mahlau, METHODOLOGY OF PRODUCT ECOBALANCES AND MO DELS FOR THEIR ASSESSMENT INCLUDING EXAMPLES OF THE PRODUCT ECOBALANCE OF MILK PACKAGES, Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte, 45(4), 1993, pp. 309-357
After the presentation of the main points of criticism in regard to th
e method ,,ecobalance'' and especially to product ecobalance in chapte
r 1, chapter 2 defines, first, a number of special notions belonging t
o the field of ecobalance and environment, as, for this, no uniforn no
menclature is existing. The survey in chapter 3 of the methodical elem
ents of product ecobalances using the example of milk packages shows,
that a PEB, in which careful vertical and horizontal analysis, as well
as thorough data aquisition has been made, allows the relative enviro
nmental tolerance of a product to be determined. As a result of a PEB
frequently partial findings are obtained, which may contain contrary i
nformation. A reduction of these abundant individual results is only p
ossible to a certain extent by ,,cumulative parameters''. Aggregation
of the different product-specific environmental uses into a parameter
by means of a method of evaluation shall allow a clear-cut assessment
to be made. In chapter 4 the currently available non-monetary and mone
tary models of assessment are described. Apart from verbal-argumentati
ve evaluations, which do not yield a generally valid information, the
non-monetary methods of evaluation are frequently used. Experiences ma
de so far in Switzerland have shown, that several methods can, indeed,
be considered as being equally practicable. For Swiss ecobalances ass
essment is mainly made according to the models of critial nuisance and
ecological shortage. Monetary assessment of the environmental nuisanc
es would lead to many facilities, would, in particular, offer the poss
ibility of a comparison with economic costs. The monetarization statem
ents presented can, however, estimate so far only the value of individ
ual nuisance substances and are not equally well suited for all enviro
nmental uses. Monetarization on the basis of damage-avoidance cost or
damage cost appears quite possible in future. In chapter 5 different p
ossibilities in regard to the information on environmental nuisances w
ithin the framework of a PEB and by the ensuing ecoprofile are describ
ed. From this it appears, that both the single-product consideration a
nd comparative analysis of several functional alternatives enable an i
nformation on environmental uses to be obtained. The designation ,,eco
balance'' is frequently considered incorrect, because no two-sided bal
ance is recognisable as final survey. With respect to the accounting b
alance the kinds of environmental uses can be characterized in this pu
blication as assets and the phases of the ,,product path'' as total eq
uity and liabilities. A balance sheet total can be made via aggregatio
n of the different uses and nuisances by using an evaluation process.
It does not appear useful to extend the PEB beyond the analysis of the
environmental effects. Here special studies should be made in paralle
l. Chapter 6 concerns the development of the product ecobalance in Ger
many and Switzerland. In Germany a standard method for product balanci
ng is recently being developed. The built-up of a database for environ
mental nuisances by packages is to be completed in the near future. A
computer software for processing these data is being developed in para
llel. It is evident that Switzerland is several years ahead in the fie
ld of product balancing. In 1991 an up-dated data collection in regard
to the environmental nuisances of packaging material was published by
the Swiss environmental ministry. These data are contained in the EDP
program ,,Oko-Base II of the ,,Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund'', which c
an, however, not be applied without modifications in the FRG. The meth
odical development of the product ecobalances is not yet completed in
the Federal Republic. Discussions of the theoretical bases and the ana
lyses of corresponding examples have shown, that, by considering a num
ber of criteria for preparing the balance and publication of the resul
ts a reconstructible measurement of the environmental nuisances is pos
sible.