PEAK TORQUE OCCURRENCE IN THE RANGE OF MOTION DURING ISOKINETIC EXTENSION AND FLEXION OF THE KNEE

Citation
P. Kannus et B. Beynnon, PEAK TORQUE OCCURRENCE IN THE RANGE OF MOTION DURING ISOKINETIC EXTENSION AND FLEXION OF THE KNEE, International journal of sports medicine, 14(8), 1993, pp. 422-426
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences
ISSN journal
01724622
Volume
14
Issue
8
Year of publication
1993
Pages
422 - 426
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-4622(1993)14:8<422:PTOITR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to 1) assess the knee angles of hamstrin g and quadriceps peak torques at slow (60 degrees.sec(-1)) and moderat e (180 degrees.sec(-1)) isokinetic velocities in healthy adult males ( N = 143) and females (N = 106), 2) determine if velocity has an effect on these peak torque angles, and 3) determine if subject's age, sex, and muscle strength have an effect on the results. The Cybex II dynamo meter was used to record the measurements. At 60 degrees.sec(-1), the mean peak torque for the hamstrings occurred at 33 degrees for men and 37 degrees for women (p<0.001) (0 degree = full extension). At 180 de grees.sec(-1), the corresponding angles were 40 and 44 degrees (p<0.01 ). In both groups the increase was 7 degrees (p<0.001). At 60 degrees. sec(-1), the peak torque angle of the quadriceps was 54 degrees in bot h groups. At 180 degrees.sec(-1), the angle occurred significantly lat er in men (11 degrees later) and in women (10 degrees later) (p<0.001 for both). Subject's age (18 to 40 years) did not affect the results. In female hamstrings, the knee angle of peak torque had a highly signi ficant (P<0.001) negative correlation to muscle strength; that is, in female hamstrings, the peak torque angles occurred later in the range of motion when muscle strength decreased. This possibly explained the difference observed between men and women in the peak torque angles of hamstrings. In conclusion, people involved in isokinetic testing of m uscular performance should be aware that the peak torque occurs later in the range of motion with increasing angular velocity, especially wh en testing weak muscle groups. In high angular velocities this may bec ome a problem since the limb may pass the optimal joint position for m uscular performance, and the recorded peak torque may not represent th e subject's maximal torque capacity.