W. Hanna et al., THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ERICA IN BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE - A UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS, Modern pathology, 6(6), 1993, pp. 748-754
In breast cancer, primary tumor size (T), the number of lymph node met
astases (#N), the biochemical estrogen (ER), and progesterone (PGR) re
ceptor status have all been important prognostic variables. We evaluat
ed the significance of the immunocytochemical measurement of estrogen
receptors suing the ERICA method. To determine the relative prognostic
value of these variables T, #N, ER, PGR, ERICA and adjuvant treatment
, (ADJ), univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival
(DFS) were performed for 154 primary breast cancer patients who were
diagnosed in 1985 to 1986 at Women's College Hospital and followed pro
spectively. We analyzed ERICA results using different classification s
ystems, and assessed clinical cut points for the univariate and multiv
ariate context. The variables consistently included in the best Cox st
epwise regression are T, (p < 0.01), ADJ (p < 0.01), #N (p < 0.01), an
d ERICA (p < 0.01). There was weaker evidence of an association betwee
n DFS and the biochemically determined ER; ER was not included in the
model with a cut point at 10 fmol mg of protein. This illustrates the
value of the ERICA method in predicting outcome, and suggests the need
to consider ERICA values for clinical decision making.