T. Suzuki et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN ANAPLASTIC SEMINOMA AND TYPICAL SEMINOMA, Acta Pathologica Japonica, 43(12), 1993, pp. 751-757
In order to study the possible biological differences between anaplast
ic and typical seminoma, the following factors were studied in 11 case
s of anaplastic seminoma and 15 cases of typical seminoma: mitotic act
ivity, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression, immunohis
tochemical analyses for cytokeratin, vimentin, placental alkaline phos
phatase (FLAP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), alpha-fe
toprotein (AFP) and c-myc oncoprotein. Anaplastic seminoma was classif
ied according to Mostofi's criteria, which is primarily based on the m
itotic activity of the tumor. Mitotic activity was evaluated by both m
itotic count and rate. Statistically significant correlations were obs
erved between mitotic count and mitotic rate (R = 0.891), and between
the mitotic count and PCNA labeling index (R = 0.792), in both typical
and anaplastic seminomas. Immunostaining patterns for cytokeratin, vi
mentin, PLAP, beta-hCG, AFP and c-myc oncoprotein were not significant
ly different between typical and anaplastic seminoma. The present data
indicated that no apparent clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical
parameters discerning anaplastic seminoma from typical seminoma were p
resent, when identifying anaplastic seminoma on the basis of high mito
tic count. Anaplastic seminoma may therefore simply represent seminoma
with high proliferative activity.