GROUND TILT ANOMALIES ACCOMPANYING THE MAIN EARTHQUAKES OCCURRED IN THE CENTRAL APENNINES (ITALY) DURING THE PERIOD 1986-1989

Citation
F. Bella et al., GROUND TILT ANOMALIES ACCOMPANYING THE MAIN EARTHQUAKES OCCURRED IN THE CENTRAL APENNINES (ITALY) DURING THE PERIOD 1986-1989, Nuovo cimento della Societa italiana di fisica. C, Geophysics and space physics, 16(4), 1993, pp. 393-406
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary","Astronomy & Astrophysics
ISSN journal
11241896
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
393 - 406
Database
ISI
SICI code
1124-1896(1993)16:4<393:GTAATM>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
A four-year set of tilt data (1988-1989) recorded at three sites of th e Central Apennines (Italy) and which in the past pointed out quite go od raw tilt responses to seismicity, only with moderate thermoelastic effects, have been investigated to search for the possible existence o f tilt anomalies accompanying the main earthquakes of the region. It h as been observed that, even if fairly good tilt responses to principal events seem to appear, correlations of similar or better quality are obtained when comparing the same tilts with pressure and mainly with t emperature. However, when taking into account earthquakes with magnitu des M greater than or equal to 3.0 and more strict E (strain) and L (s ource dimension) threshold values (the last two parameters being used to evaluate tilt field at a distance R), only one event (M = 3.5; R = 5.1 km) has been selected and tectonic from non-tectonic contributions have been pointed out clearly at one tilt site. The quoted earthquake showed the best E and R/L values (E = 10(-6); R/L = 2.4) in the whole period and it was preceded by a clear tilt anomaly with amplitude and duration of about 5 mu rad and 2 months, respectively. Since the tilt signal in this period is not affected by any non-tectonic effect (max imum correlation coefficient with temperature r = 0.2) the quoted anom aly has been considered as a probable precursor of the above-mentioned earthquake it preceds. Residual, tilt vector oscillations along the d irection-including the epicentral area of this event, were also observ ed. On the contrary, all the remaining anomalous tilts proved to be we ll justified with pressure and/or temperature variations (r values up to 0.8).