When during the last three decades of the 19th century German clinical
medicine was established as a natural science anatomy e.g. was referr
ed to as a model on this way. At that time this discipline, however, w
as delved into Richtungskampfe between evolutionary morphology on the
one side and physiological and clinical orientated anatomy on the othe
r, comprising a discussion on the Wissenschaftlichkeit of the differen
t directions. In the end anatomy evolved as a medical discipline leavi
ng evolutionary morphology to the zoologists. Concomitantly with this
change in the self-conception of the discipline as a natural science a
natomy was charged with the imprinting of the prospective physician an
d his picture of the human being. This respective picture is analysed
in the anatomical illustration from Vesalius up to nowadays considerin
g the unity of art and anatomy in the visual media as well as in its d
isjunction. In this context the dominance of science on art in the ser
vice of anatomy is discussed with special reference to the neoclassica
l influence on further development. The latter is characterized by an
increasing abstraction and diagrammatic representation of the human fi
gure referring to man as a reparable electrochemical machine without m
ystery. This corresponds to a clinical medicine comprehending as a rep
arative and mechanical profession. The restauration of a human picture
of the human being may be achieved by an anatomy directed to life and
an art extended to an anthropological conception.