T. Alimelkkila et al., REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR CATARACT-SURGERY - COMPARISON OF 3 TECHNIQUES, British journal of ophthalmology, 77(12), 1993, pp. 771-773
Two methods of periocular anaesthesia (PI and PII) were compared with
the traditional retrobulbar block in a prospective study of 450 patien
ts undergoing elective cataract extraction and intraocular lens implan
tation. A solution of local anaesthetic containing equal amounts of 2%
lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was used in all the groups. Hyaluroni
dase (75 IU/10 ml of local anaesthetic solution) was added. Three grou
ps of patients were studied, with 150 patients in each group. The retr
obulbar injection (group R) was performed with 4 ml of the anaesthetic
solution through the lower eyelid inferotemporally and a further 6 ml
was injected for seventh cranial nerve block. In the first periocular
technique (group PI) the local anaesthetic was injected inferotempora
lly (5 ml) through the lower lid and superonasally (5 ml) through the
upper tid. In the second periocular technique (PII) the injections wer
e performed inferotemporally (5 ml) and into the medial compartment (2
ml) of the orbit at the medial canthus. Satisfactory anaesthesia coul
d be achieved with all of these methods. Additional block because of i
nsufficient akinesia of the muscles was required in 12% (18/150) in gr
oup R, in 19% (28/150) in group PI, and in 11% (16/150) in PII. The me
dial compartment technique (PII) was associated with the highest perce
ntage of total akinesia of the muscles and lowest reblock rate. All th
ree methods produced sufficient analgesia during surgery and there wer
e no differences in the requirements for additional analgesic drugs du
ring surgery. It is concluded that the medial compartment technique re
presents a good alternative to retrobulbar block.