W. Fujimaki et al., CYTOKINE PRODUCTION AND IMMUNE CELL ACTIVATION IN MELANOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH LIPOSOMAL MURAMYL TRIPEPTIDE (CGP-19835A LIPID), Cancer biotherapy, 8(4), 1993, pp. 307-318
We conducted a pilot study using liposome-encapsulated muramyl tripept
ide phosphatidylethanolamine (L-MTP-PE) preoperatively in patients wit
h stage III or IV resectable melanoma who were at high risk for recurr
ence. Patients received L-MTP-PE for 1 month before surgery and then 5
months postoperatively. Several immune parameters were monitored duri
ng preoperative therapy to search for correlations with clinical (tumo
r) response. The 18 patients were classified into three groups accordi
ng to their responses and disease-free intervals: no evidence of disea
se (NED) at week 24 of therapy, relapse during therapy and progressive
disease on therapy noted at the time of surgery. Six of nine patients
in the NED group demonstrated increased monocyte tumoricidal activity
(MTA) during week 1 of therapy. MTA increased in three of the six pat
ients in the relapse group. MTA did not increase in the three patients
who had progressive disease on therapy. Plasma neopterin levels were
elevated by 72 h following the first L-MTP-PE dose in all 18 patients.
Circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor were elevated in 15 of 16
patients tested, and IL-6 levels were elevated in all 18 patients. Me
lanoma cells from all three patients with progressive disease at the t
ime of surgery proliferated well in vitro, whereas tumor cells from 10
of the 15 patients in the other two groups did not proliferate. There
were no discernible differences among the three groups in the magnitu
de of IL-2-induced proliferation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Ho
wever, IL-2-activated TILs from the NED group exhibited cytotoxicity a
gainst autologous tumor cells in vitro. In summary, whereas L-MTP-PE s
timulated several immunologic responses in all patients, the only two
parameters that correlated with clinical status were MTA and the tumor
proliferation assay. These two biologic assays could serve to disting
uish potential responders from nonresponders early in the course of tr
eatment.