DOES AMINOPHYLLINE BENEFIT ADULTS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR AN ACUTE EXACERBATION OF ASTHMA

Citation
D. Huang et al., DOES AMINOPHYLLINE BENEFIT ADULTS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR AN ACUTE EXACERBATION OF ASTHMA, Annals of internal medicine, 119(12), 1993, pp. 1155-1160
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00034819
Volume
119
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1155 - 1160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(1993)119:12<1155:DABAAT>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of adding intravenous theophylline (administered as aminophylline) to nebulizations of albuterol and intr avenous methylprednisolone in adults hospitalized for acute asthma. De sign: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Setting: Inp atient service of a tertiary-care, university teaching hospital. Patie nts: 21 adults (22 to 48 years old)-10 in the aminophylline group and 11 in the placebo group. Interventions: Nebulized albuterol, 2.5 or 5. 0 mg every 0.5 to 4 hours; intravenous methylprednisolone, 60 mg every 6 hours; and either individualized doses of aminophylline or placebo for 48 hours. Measurements: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ), the number of ''as needed'' albuterol nebulizations and total dose, asthma symptom scores, and adverse effects. Results: At admission fro m the emergency department, the mean +/- SD baseline FEV1 was 49% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 43% +/- 13% of the predicted value in the placebo group. The improvement in FEV1 a t 3 hours was greater in the aminophylline group (29% +/- 23% compared with 10% +/- 10% in the placebo group; mean difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 3 to 35 percentage points; P = 0.023). At 48 hours, F EV1 was 75% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 58% +/- 15% of the predicted value in the placebo group (mean diff erence, 17 percentage points; CI, 0.2 to 34.8 percentage points; P = 0 .048). Aminophylline-treated patients required fewer nebulizations of albuterol (10.3 +/- 3.8 compared with 16.4 +/- 5.3; mean difference, - 6.1; CI, -10.3 to -1.8) and less total dosage (34 +/- 16 mg compared w ith 70 +/- 34 mg; mean difference, -36 mg; CI, -60.6 to -11.3 mg P = 0 .02). No statistical differences were observed in asthma symptom score s or frequency of adverse effects. Conclusions: Individualized doses o f intravenous theophylline added to frequent nebulizations of albutero l and intravenous methylprednisolone appear to benefit adults admitted to the hospital with acute asthma and are well tolerated when serum c oncentrations are maintained in the therapeutic range.