During a 9-year period, 183 consecutive patients underwent total colec
tomy and the endorectal ileal pull-through procedure (ERIPT) for ulcer
ative colitis (UC) (n=156), familial polyposis (n=25), or Hirschprung'
s disease (n=2). The average age was 29.4 years (range 7.1-59.1 years)
. Ail patients with UC were steroid-dependent at the time of operation
. Two groups were retrospectively reviewed based on the management of
their midline abdominal wounds. Ninety consecutive patients underwent
the ERIPT procedure between 1983 and 1987 with stapled skin closure an
d perioperative intravenous antibiotics (group W). Between 1988 and 19
92, 93 patients had abdominal wall closure in the same manner, however
, the wounds were probed daily in four to six sites for the first five
postoperative days with a Q-tip moistened with 2 per cent aqueous mer
curachrome solution (group 2A). Approximately four months after ERIPT,
ileostomy closure was performed on 176 of the patients, of whom 89 ha
d no wound probing (group 1B), and 87 had probing (group 2B). Followin
g colectomy and the ERIPT procedure, 22/90 group 1A patients (24.4%) a
nd 4/93 group 2A patients (4.3%) developed wound infections. Following
ileostomy closure only 3/89 (3.4%) group 1B patients and 1/87 (1.2%)
group 2B patients developed wound infections. No group 2A or B patient
s required wound packing, and none had prolonged hospitalization. In c
ontrast, 17 group 1A patients spent more than 1 extra day of hospitali
zation (mean 2.8 days) and required wound packing a mean of 22.6 days
after hospital discharge. This wound infection rate is significantly l
ower for group 2A versus 1A patients (P<0.0001, ANOVA). The wound infe
ction rate after ileostomy closure between groups 1B and 2B was not si
gnificantly different. Wound probing to evacuate clot or seroma during
the first 5 postoperative days in steroid-dependent, high-risk patien
ts undergoing major colorectal surgery permits expeditious wound closu
re without the need for open wound packing and delayed healing.