Peer nomination were used to evaluate the social reputation of 230 fra
ncophone students enroled in the second, third and fourth grades of Mo
ntreal elementary schools. Children were assessed collectively by thei
r peers on eight dimensions requiring both social and academic judgeme
nts. Cluster analysis of classmate judgements yielded four distinct so
cial reputations. Two groups of children had extremely differentiated
profiles: one group was judged quite positively on all eight dimension
s, while a second was characterized as uniformally negative on all of
these indices. A third group appeared average on each of the measures,
while a fourth group was judged average on social functioning, but po
or on academic indices. A comparison of peer and teacher evaluations r
evealed a high level of convergence in the perception of social reputa
tion, especially for the two most extreme groups.