EQUIVALENT ELECTRICAL SOURCE ANALYSIS OF PAIN-RELATED SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS ELICITED BY A CO2-LASER

Citation
Im. Tarkka et Rd. Treede, EQUIVALENT ELECTRICAL SOURCE ANALYSIS OF PAIN-RELATED SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS ELICITED BY A CO2-LASER, Journal of clinical neurophysiology, 10(4), 1993, pp. 513-519
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
ISSN journal
07360258
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
513 - 519
Database
ISI
SICI code
0736-0258(1993)10:4<513:EESAOP>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to localize possible neural sources of p ain-related cortical evoked potentials. A brain electrical source anal ysis was performed on late somatosensory evoked potential data (500-ms window was analyzed) elicited by short heat pulses produced by a CO2 laser. These stimuli activate pain and temperature pathways. The first , fairly small, negative response can be recorded on the scalp about 1 60 ms from the stimulus (N1 component). The major negativity on the sc alp has its peak about 240 ms from the stimulus and is followed by a p ositivity (N2 and P2 components). A four-dipole model was developed us ing data following left-hand stimulation. Spatiotemporal source analys is suggested that the N1 component could be generated by contralateral activity in both primary and secondary somatosensory cortices and tha t N2 could be generated by bilateral activity mainly in secondary soma tosensory cortices. A deep dipole in the midline was active during the time range of the negative potentials and seemed to be mostly respons ible for the P2 component. This dipole was located too frontally to be thalamic, but it corresponded well to the location of the anterior ci ngulate gyrus. The model also yielded good fits for right-hand and lef t-foot stimulation data and, in addition, another set of left-hand dat a obtained with different electrode spacing in a different group of su bjects (residual variances from 2.8% to 3.3%). The model explaining da ta sets from different body part stimulations varied very little, exce pt with respect to the location of the dipole representing the activit y of the primary somatosensory area. The models for the two left-hand stimulation data sets were similar, with dipole locations within a few millimeters of one another.