Chemotactic excitation responses to caged ligand photorelease of rapid
ly swimming bacteria that reverse (Vibrio alginolyticus) or tumble (Es
cherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium) have been measured by compu
ter. Mutants were used to assess the effects of abnormal motility beha
vior upon signal processing times and test feasibility of kinetic anal
yses of the signaling pathway in intact bacteria. N-1-(2-Nitrophenyl)e
thoxycarbonyl-L-serine and 2-hydroxyphenyl 1-(2-nitrophenyl) ethyl pho
sphate were synthesized. These compounds are a 'caged' serine and a 'c
aged' proton and on flash photolysis release serine and protons and at
tractant and repellent ligands, respectively, for Tsr, the serine rece
ptor. The product quantum yield for serine was 0.65 (+/- 0.05) and the
rate of serine release was proportional to [H+] near-neutrality with
a rate constant of 17 s-1 at pH 7.0 and 21-degrees-C. The product quan
tum yield for protons was calculated to be 0.095 on 308-nm irradiation
but 0.29 (+/- 0.02) on 300-350-nm irradiation, with proton release oc
curring at > 10(5) s-1. The pH jumps produced were estimated using pH
indicators, the pH-dependent decay of the chromophoric aci-nitro inter
mediate and bioassays. Receptor deletion mutants did not respond to ph
otorelease of the caged ligands. Population responses occurred without
measurable latency. Response times increased with decreased stimulus
strength. Physiological or genetic perturbation of motor rotation bias
leading to increased tumbling reduced response sensitivity but did no
t affect response times. Exceptions were found. A CheR-CheB mutant str
ain had normal motility, but reduced response. A CheZ mutant had tumbl
y motility, reduced sensitivity, and increased response time to attrac
tant, but a normal repellent response. These observations are consiste
nt with current ideas that motor interactions with a single parameter,
namely phosphorylated CheY.protein, dictate motor response to both at
tractant and repellent stimuli. Inverse motility motor mutants with ex
treme rotation bias exhibited the greatest reduction in response sensi
tivity but, nevertheless, had normal attractant response times. This i
mplies that control of CheY-phosphate concentration rather than motor
reactions limits responses to attractants.