It is clear that polar cap convection during times of northward IMF is
more structured and of lower mean speed than at times of southward IM
F. This, coupled with the fact that the polar cap is smaller, means th
at empirical models are more difficult to construct with certainty. It
is also clear that sunward flow deep in the polar cap is often observ
ed, but its connection with the rest of the flow pattern is controvers
ial. At present, empirical models are of three types: 'statistical' mo
dels wherein data from different days but with similar IMF conditions
are averaged together: 'pattern recognition' models, which are built u
p by examining individually hundreds of passes to derive a 'typical' p
attern which embodies features frequently observed; and 'assimilative'
models, which use data of different types and from as many locations
as possible, but all taken at the same time, in order to derive a snap
shot (or series of snapshots) of the entire pattern. Each type of mode
l has its own difficulties. Statistical models, by their very nature,
smooth out now features (e.g. the convection reversal, and the locus o
f sunward flow deep in the polar cap) which are not found at precisely
the same invariant latitudes and magnetic local times on different da
ys. Pattern recognition models are better at reproducing small-scale f
eatures, but the large-scale pattern can be a matter of interpretation
. Assimilative models (such as AMIE) hold out the best hope for creati
ng instantaneous, global convection patterns; however, the analysis te
chnique tends to be most irregular (and least reliable) in the regions
which are not well covered by in situ data. It appears that, at least
at times, a four cell model with sunward flow at the highest and lowe
st latitudes, and antisunward flow in between, is consistent with the
observations. At other times, the observations may be consistent with
a two-cell convection pattern, but which includes significant meanders
within the polar cap.