Study objective: To assess conventional, large chest tube therapy in i
atrogenic pneumothorax and to determine the optimal moment when to use
more invasive procedures. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting
: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: Fort
y-seven patients with needle-induced iatrogenic pneumothorax. Twenty-f
our patients had an underlying pleural or pulmonary disorder. Interven
tions: After insertion of a 20- to 24-French plastic chest tube connec
ted to an underwater seal, suction was maintained until gas egress sto
pped or up to 10 days in patients with a persisting gas leak. Results:
In 96 percent, a definite occlusion of the pneumothorax was achieved.
in all patients without an underlying lung disorder, gas egress stopp
ed definitely after 72 h. In the presence of an underlying lung disord
er, 92 percent of the pneumothoraces were healed after 10 days of cont
inuous suction therapy. At 72 h, only 71 percent of the latter group w
ere healed (p<0.05 vs patients without lung disease). No major complic
ation of chest tube therapy occurred. Conclusion: Conventional chest t
ube therapy is a safe and effective treatment for iatrogenic pneumotho
rax. In patients with an underlying lung disease, gas egress may last
for up to 10 days. In these patients, the earlier use of a more invasi
ve approach may be justified if the air leak persists.