ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC ONDANSETRON IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH METOCLOPRAMIDE

Citation
Jh. Raphael et Ac. Norton, ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC ONDANSETRON IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH METOCLOPRAMIDE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(6), 1993, pp. 845-848
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00070912
Volume
71
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
845 - 848
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(1993)71:6<845:AEOPOI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological l aparoscopic surgery. The patients received either iv. ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. Th e number of patients with no nausea or vomiting in the ondansteron gro up was 50 (82%) compared with 29 (47%) in the metoclopramide group (P < 0.001). In those patients with a previous history of postoperative n ausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondanset ron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclu de that preoperative prophylactic administration of i. v. ondansetron was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for day- case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery .