Jh. Raphael et Ac. Norton, ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC ONDANSETRON IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH METOCLOPRAMIDE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(6), 1993, pp. 845-848
In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic
antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123
patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological l
aparoscopic surgery. The patients received either iv. ondansetron 4 mg
or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. Th
e number of patients with no nausea or vomiting in the ondansteron gro
up was 50 (82%) compared with 29 (47%) in the metoclopramide group (P
< 0.001). In those patients with a previous history of postoperative n
ausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondanset
ron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclu
de that preoperative prophylactic administration of i. v. ondansetron
was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after
general anaesthesia for day- case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery
.