Da. Hepburn et al., PHYSIOLOGICAL, SYMPTOMATIC AND HORMONAL RESPONSES TO ACUTE HYPOGLYCEMIA IN TYPE-1 DIABETIC-PATIENTS WITH AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY, Diabetic medicine, 10(10), 1993, pp. 940-949
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
The effects of peripheral autonomic neuropathy on the symptomatic, phy
siological, and hormonal responses to acute insulin-induced hypoglycae
mia were studied in two groups of patients with Type 1 diabetes, match
ed for age, duration of diabetes, and prevailing glycaemic control. A
group of eight patients who gave a history of normal awareness of hypo
glycaemia and had normal cardiovascular autonomic function tests were
compared to a group of six patients who had symptoms of autonomic dysf
unction and gross abnormalities of cardiovascular autonomic function t
ests. An additional two patients with autonomic neuropathy who also ha
d hypoglycaemia unawareness were studied. Acute hypoglycaemia was indu
ced by intravenous infusion of insulin (2.5 mU kg(-1) min(-1)) and the
onset of the acute autonomic reaction (R) was identified objectively
by the sudden rise in heart rate and onset of sweating. Cognitive func
tion and hypoglycaemia symptom scores were estimated serially, and pla
sma counterregulatory hormones were measured. Acute autonomic activati
on was observed to occur in all subjects in response to hypoglycaemia
and commenced at similar venous plasma glucose concentrations in both
groups (neuropathic patients: 1.6 +/- 0.2 mmol l(-1) vs non-neuropathi
c patients 1.6 +/- 0.2 mmol l(-1), p = 0.9,). In the neuropathic patie
nts plasma adrenaline responses were significantly lower at all time p
oints from time R until time R + 30 min (MANOVA for repeated measures,
F=19.4, p< 0.001). The total autonomic symptom score at R was slightl
y lower in the neuropathic patients (12 (8-12) median (range)) but was
not significantly different from the non-neuropathic patients (14 (10
-26), p = 0.10), and the total neuroglycopenic symptom scores we re ve
ry similar (neuropathic group: 11 (6-21) vs non-neuropathic group: 11.
5 (6-22), p = 0.95). Although some of the autonomic responses were low
er, but not significantly so, in the patients with autonomic neuropath
y this study suggests that peripheral autonomic neuropathy is not the
principal cause of hypoglycaemia unawareness in patients with Type 1 d
iabetes.