THE VALUE OF QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF GLUCOSE-UTILIZATION IN DETECTION OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY BY PET

Citation
Mj. Knuuti et al., THE VALUE OF QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF GLUCOSE-UTILIZATION IN DETECTION OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY BY PET, The Journal of nuclear medicine, 34(12), 1993, pp. 2068-2075
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
01615505
Volume
34
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
2068 - 2075
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-5505(1993)34:12<2068:TVOQOG>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
To study whether absolute quantitation of regional myocardial glucose utilization (rMGU) enhances detection of myocardial viability, 70 nond iabetic patients with prior myocardial infarction and angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease were studied with [F-18]FDG PET aft er oral glucose loading. Forty-eight patients were also revascularized and underwent echocardiography after revascularization to detect wall motion recovery. The rMGU was calculated in eight myocardial segments in each patient and the results were compared to normalized (relative ) [F-18]FDG uptake values. In normal segments (n = 225), rMGU was 56 /- 18 mu mole/min/100 g (mean +/- s.d.) and relative [F-18]FDG uptake 97% +/- 12%. The interindividual variation of rMGU in normal myocardiu m was greater than the intraindividual variation (s.d. 31% versus 11%) . The respective values for relative [F-18]FDG uptake were 9% and 10%. Both rMGU and [F-18]FDG uptake were significantly reduced in segments with scarring observed visually during bypass surgery (29 +/- 19 mu m ole/min/100 g and 45% +/- 22%, n = 26). The rMGU and [F-18]FDG uptake were higher in segments that recovered after revascularization (53 +/- 17 mu mole/min/100/g and 110% +/- 21%, n = 27) than in those that did not (37 +/- 20 mu mole/min/100 g and 65% +/- 24%, n = 63). However, d ue to larger variability of rMGU values, normalized [F-18]FDG uptake w as superior to rMGU in separating normal and scar segments as well as in predicting wall motion recovery. We conclude that rMGU variability is notable and is caused mainly by variations between patients. Interi ndividual variation is reduced by normalization, which results in more accurate assessment of myocardial viability. Thus, static imaging and semiquantitative analysis are sufficient for the clinical assessment of myocardial viability.