USE OF ULTRASOUND TO GUIDE RADIATION BOOST PLANNING FOLLOWING LUMPECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST

Citation
C. Leonard et al., USE OF ULTRASOUND TO GUIDE RADIATION BOOST PLANNING FOLLOWING LUMPECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(5), 1993, pp. 1193-1197
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
27
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1193 - 1197
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1993)27:5<1193:UOUTGR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if sonographic localization of the breast lumpec tomy site is feasible and useful in boost planning. Methods and Materi als: The operative beds following lumpectomy were localized by ultraso und in 22 patients (15-infiltrating ductal, 7-ductal carcinoma in situ ; size: .4-2.0 cm). Twelve patients had two ultrasound examinations on different days for a total of 34 examinations. Twenty-one patients ha d their course of boost electron therapy planned using ultrasound to g uide field placement. While the patient was in the treatment position, the surgical scar was placed at the machine's isocenter. With the ele ctron cone in place, the ultrasound transducer was placed within the c one on top of the surgical scar. The biopsy site was localized and the light field maneuvered so that it's central axis would follow the axi s of the transducer, transecting both the scar and biopsy site. Result s: The operative bed was highly visible in 26 ultrasound examinations, visible in 7, and subtly visible in 1. Every biopsy site showed some hypoechoic area but most appeared as the mixed hypoechoic pattern. Ult rasound appearances were mixed or mostly hypoechoic (28), anechoic wit h irregular walls (4), and echoic (hypoechoic compared to parenchyma) (2). In two cases the surgeon placed surgical clips in the operative b ed, and in both cases several of these clips could be identified at th e margins of the operative bed as hyperechoic foci with shadowing. The mean depth of the operative bed was 21 mm (range 17-36 mm). In 12 pat ients, two ultrasound examinations were performed on different days, a nd the mean depth difference between these scans was 2 mm with a range of 0-5 mm. Among patients with two scans we found that both the locat ion and appearance of the operative bed was highly reproducible. Concl usion: Ultrasound can successfully be used to localize the biopsy site and facilitate boost field placement in patients treated with lumpect omy and radiation.