Hl. Lipton et Ja. Bird, DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW IN AMBULATORY SETTINGS - STATE OF THE SCIENCEAND DIRECTIONS FOR OUTCOMES RESEARCH, Medical care, 31(12), 1993, pp. 1069-1082
There are escalating national pressures to analyze pharmaceutical outc
omes and to develop drug-related clinical guidelines. These interests
coincide with passage of the Medicaid Rebate Law (OBRA, 1990), which m
andates the implementation of prospective and retrospective drug utili
zation review (DUR) programs by Medicaid in 1993. This report investig
ates DUR programs that target outpatient drug therapies. The authors p
resent a conceptual framework that identifies the factors influencing
drug prescribing and the range of potential patient outcomes. Current
types of DUR interventions and their applications are described, in ad
dition to problems that hinder implementation or evaluation of DUR pro
grams. DUR evaluation studies are reviewed, and a critique identifies
the limitations of available DUR research. The authors recommend an ex
panded DUR policy research agenda, strongly suggesting that priority b
e given to studies in the following areas: DUR criteria development an
d validation; prevalence of prescribing problems and their association
with patient outcomes; efficacy, toxicity and costs of therapeutic al
ternatives; and DUR program evaluation. The overall conclusion is that
the state of the science pertaining to DUR is not well developed. The
potential of DUR may not be realized due to the lack of resources nee
ded to design, implement, and evaluate effective programs. Instead, DU
R efforts may be limited to cost-containment issues without due consid
eration of quality-of-care outcomes. The authors call for rigorous eva
luation efforts to inform DUR design and implementation, thereby assur
ing more rational prescribing and enhancing patient outcomes.