NORMATIVE DATA FOR INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTORS (IGFS), IGF-BINDING PROTEINS, AND GROWTH HORMONE-BINDING PROTEIN IN A HEALTHY SPANISH PEDIATRIC POPULATION - AGE-RELATED AND SEX-RELATED CHANGES
J. Argente et al., NORMATIVE DATA FOR INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTORS (IGFS), IGF-BINDING PROTEINS, AND GROWTH HORMONE-BINDING PROTEIN IN A HEALTHY SPANISH PEDIATRIC POPULATION - AGE-RELATED AND SEX-RELATED CHANGES, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 77(6), 1993, pp. 1522-1528
The normal values of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) after extracti
on, their binding proteins, and the high affinity GH-binding protein a
re not well established in infancy or childhood. We report the relatio
nship between serum IGF-I, IGF-II, their binding proteins IGFBP-1 and
IGFBP-3, and GH-binding protein in 600 normal Spanish children who whe
re divided into 5 groups according to Tanner stage: I, 150 males and 1
02 females; II, 40 males and 42 females; III, 45 males and 45 females;
IV, 42 males and 55 females; and V, 23 males and 56 females. Serum IG
F-I levels increase slowly during childhood in both sexes, exhibiting
a dramatic increase during puberty and a significant decline [P < 0.00
1, by analysis of variance (ANOVA)] during adulthood. The pubertal pea
k occurs approximately 2 yr earlier in girls than in boys. In contrast
, serum IGF-II levels remain stable throughout childhood, showing no p
ubertal peak. In boys, there is a significant decline in IGF-II levels
during adulthood (P < 0.001). Serum IGFBP-3 levels show a pattern sim
ilar to that of IGF-I, with a significant increase during childhood an
d a significant decline during adulthood (P < 0.001, ANOVA) in both ma
les and females. In contrast, serum IGFBP-1 levels decrease dramatical
ly during childhood in both boys and girls (P < 0.001 and P < 0.005, r
espectively, by ANOVA). A significant decline in serum GH-binding prot
ein levels is observed between prepubertal and pubertal children of bo
th sexes (P < 0.001). There is a close linear correlation between the
sum of serum IGF-I plus IGF-II levels vs. serum IGFBP-3 (r = 0.724; P
< 0.0001). In contrast, there is a nonlinear correlation between serum
IGF-I vs. serum IGFBP-3 (concave curve) as well as between serum IGF-
II and serum IGFBP-3 (convex curve). A negative correlation was found
between serum IGF-I vs. IGFBP-1 (r = -0.51; P < 0.0001) as well as bet
ween the sum of serum IGF-I plus IGF-II vs. IGFBP-1 (r = -0.47; P < 0.
0001), but not between serum IGF-II and IGFBP-1. These data emphasize
that when these tests are performed in the clinic, their interpretatio
n should be based upon age- and sex-specific criteria.