PURGATORY OR PLACE OF SAFETY - THE MANAGERIAL PLATEAU AND ORGANIZATIONAL AGEGRADING

Authors
Citation
N. Nicholson, PURGATORY OR PLACE OF SAFETY - THE MANAGERIAL PLATEAU AND ORGANIZATIONAL AGEGRADING, Human relations, 46(12), 1993, pp. 1369-1389
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Social, Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
00187267
Volume
46
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1369 - 1389
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-7267(1993)46:12<1369:POPOS->2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The managerial plateau is generally assumed to be problematic for orga nizations, generated by motives for advancement outstripping opportuni ties for upward mobility. However, previous research has used unitary criteria for plateauing of untested validity, and failed to examine th e phenomenon contextually by taking account of internal labor market c haracteristics. Measurement of agegrading was used to address these pr oblems. Drawing upon a sample of 4000 managers al various levels of a large corporation the present study had three objectives. First, in se tting out to evaluate the characteristics of the internal labor market , results showed patterns consistent with a partial ''tournament'' car eer system, but also that different career systems may coexist within the single organization, through advancement criteria differing across company levels. Second, in aiming to assess the relationships between conventional plateau criteria and agegrading, agegrading was found to covary with the more widely used criteria, while avoiding some of the ir difficulties. Third, looking at the consequences for managers' care er attitudes and adjustment, it was found that off-line slow (i.e., pl ateaued) managers did not exhibit lowered career satisfaction, adjustm ent, or mobility aspirations, despite the fact that they have lower ex pectations of promotional and non-promotional job moves. At the same t ime some off-line fast (i.e., high fliers) managers did have higher sa tisfactions and expectations. Results are interpreted in terms of coun tervailing satisfactions, exit costs, and loyalty. It is also noted th at these features can conceal from companies the shortcomings of their career development systems, and lead to the neglect of constructive a lternatives to promotion for plateaued staff.