FEASIBILITY STUDY OF INTRAARTERIAL VS INTRAVENOUS CISPLATIN, BCNU, AND TENIPOSIDE COMBINED WITH SYSTEMIC CISPLATIN, TENIPOSIDE, CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE, GLYCEROL AND MANNITOL IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY AND METASTATIC BRAIN-TUMORS
Dj. Stewart et al., FEASIBILITY STUDY OF INTRAARTERIAL VS INTRAVENOUS CISPLATIN, BCNU, AND TENIPOSIDE COMBINED WITH SYSTEMIC CISPLATIN, TENIPOSIDE, CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE, GLYCEROL AND MANNITOL IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY AND METASTATIC BRAIN-TUMORS, Journal of neuro-oncology, 17(1), 1993, pp. 71-79
Sixteen patients with intracerebral tumors received intraarterial cisp
latin, teniposide, and BCNU combined with intravenous cisplatin, tenip
oside, and cytosine arabinoside. Oral glycerol and intravenous mannito
l were given along with the intravenous chemotherapy in an attempt to
increase drug delivery to tumor by augmenting tumor blood flow. Thirte
en additional patients were treated with the same regimen, but receive
d all the chemotherapy intravenously. Of the 16 patients receiving int
raarterial chemotherapy (median survival, 14 weeks),none responded, 5
(31%) were stable for > 8 weeks, 8 (50%) failed, and 3 (19%) were unev
aluable due to early death. Of the 13 patients receiving all their tre
atment intravenously (median survival, 13 weeks), 3 (23%) responded, 1
(8%) was stable, 7 (54%) failed, and 2 (15%) were unevaluable due to
early death. In the patients receiving intraarterial chemotherapy, tox
icity included ipsilateral retinal toxicity (2 patients), ocular pain
or headache (10), periorbital swelling and flushing (6), increased bra
in edema with focal neurological deficits and drowsiness (5), and cath
eter-related carotid artery thrombosis followed by fatal herniation (1
). Myelosuppression was worse in patients who received all their treat
ment intravenously than in those receiving intraarterial chemotherapy
(p < 0.05). Neutropenic sepsis developed in 4 patients on the intraart
erial arm (1 fatal) and in 5 patients on the intravenous arm (2 fatal)
. Other toxic effects were similar whether or not patients received in
traarterial treatment or only intravenous treatment. Overall, toxicity
of this regimen was excessive, and response rates were lower than wou
ld have been expected with single agent therapy.