Ej. Sebold et Lr. Jordan, INTRAOPERATIVE GLOVE PERFORATION - A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (297), 1993, pp. 242-244
A prospective study was conducted to determine the rate of puncture of
the inner glove when various double-gloving protocols were used for e
lective total joint procedures. Group 1 consisted of 22 cases in which
two pairs of regular latex gloves were used. Group 2 consisted of 25
cases in which outer ''orthopaedic'' gloves were used over regular lat
ex gloves. Group 3 consisted of 24 cases in which Repel gloves were us
ed between two regular latex gloves. The patients were randomly assign
ed to one of the three groups. All gloves, both inner and outer, were
tested for holes at the end of the procedure. All gloves that were cha
nged for presumed intraoperative holes were also tested. The type and
duration of the procedure was also documented. Of the inner holes, the
re were significant differences between each group. Group 1 (double la
tex) and Group 2 (outer orthopaedic/inner regular) had significantly m
ore holes than Group 3 (Repel between two regular gloves). There were
no holes in Group 3, and Group 2 offered significant protection over G
roup 1.