COMPARISON OF INDUCTION AND RECOVERY BETWEEN SEVOFLURANE AND HALOTHANE SUPPLEMENTATION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING OUTPATIENT DENTAL EXTRACTIONS
Sa. Ariffin et al., COMPARISON OF INDUCTION AND RECOVERY BETWEEN SEVOFLURANE AND HALOTHANE SUPPLEMENTATION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING OUTPATIENT DENTAL EXTRACTIONS, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 78(2), 1997, pp. 157-159
We have compared sevoflurane and halothane in a double-blind controlle
d study for supplementation of nitrous oxide and oxygen anaesthesia in
80 children undergoing dental extraction as outpatients. Induction of
anaesthesia was more rapid in those who received sevoflurane compared
with those who received halothane (89 s compared with 127 s for loss
of eyelash reflex). In both groups, mean duration of administration of
anaesthesia was less than 4 min. Those who received sevoflurane were
slower to awaken (167 s compared with 102 s), although discharge times
from hospital were similar. The incidence of complications during ind
uction and maintenance was low in both groups and return to normal app
etite and activity occurred in the majority of children on the same da
y. More children who received halothane suffered nausea after leaving
hospital. We conclude that sevoflurane is a suitable alternative to ha
lothane, with more rapid induction of anaesthesia, but in these short
procedures, awakening time was slower than after halothane.