TISSUE RESISTANCE TO 1,25-DIHYDROXYVITAMIN-D WITHOUT A MUTATION OF THE VITAMIN-D RECEPTOR GENE

Citation
M. Hewison et al., TISSUE RESISTANCE TO 1,25-DIHYDROXYVITAMIN-D WITHOUT A MUTATION OF THE VITAMIN-D RECEPTOR GENE, Clinical endocrinology, 39(6), 1993, pp. 663-670
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
Journal title
ISSN journal
03000664
Volume
39
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
663 - 670
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-0664(1993)39:6<663:TRT1WA>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hereditary vitamin D resistant rickets (HVDRR) is characteri zed by severe rickets and is often accompanied by alopecia. Mutations in the gene encoding the vitamin D receptor have been found in this co ndition. In a patient with the characteristic phenotype we have invest igated the functional defect and sequenced the gene to seek a mutation . DESIGN Patient and control cell lines prepared from skin fibroblasts and peripheral brood lymphocytes were used to measure binding of 1,25 (OH)(2)D-3 and to isolate vitamin D receptor mRNA. VDR cDNA was sequen ced and transfected into receptor defective cells. PATIENT A child wit h alopecia diagnosed as having rickets due to resistance to 1,25(OH)(2 )D-3. MEASUREMENTS Cytosolic binding and nuclear association of 1,25(O H)(2)D-3 were determined in patient and control cells, and functional response to 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 assessed by measurement of 24-hydroxylase a ctivity. VDR mRNA was prepared, reverse transcribed, and cDNA sequence d. VDR cDNA was also transfected into VDR-deficient CV-1 cells and fun ctional response to 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 assessed by co-transfection with a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter plasmid. RESULTS VDR from the patient were able to bind 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 but showed no nuclea r localization resulting in an absence of functional response to 1,25( OH)(2)D-3. Sequencing revealed that the VDR coding region was normal. Expression studies of the patient's VDR showed functionally normal VDR as evidenced by normal transactivation in the presence of 1,25(OH)(2) D-3. CONCLUSION These data indicate a new cause of tissue resistance t o 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 which occurs in the absence of mutations in the codin g region of VDR gene and which is characterized by defective nuclear l ocalization of this receptor.