Tj. Schnitzer et G. Constantine, ETODOLAC (LODINE(R)) IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - RECENT STUDIES, Journal of rheumatology, 24, 1997, pp. 23-31
Etodolac (Lodine(R)) has been marketed in the United States since 1991
for managing pain and for acute and longterm treatment of the signs a
nd symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA). Etodolac was recently approved for
the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We review the results of 3 rec
ent 4 week, multicenter, placebo controlled, parallel group studies th
at compared the efficacy and safety of etodolac with naproxen and nabu
metone. Because studies of etodolac in the treatment of OA concentrate
d on bid doses, the first study compared etodolac 800 mg/day given as
400 mg bid (106 patients) and 200 mg qid (105 patients) with naproxen
1000 mg/day (109 patients) and placebo (104 patients). Etodolac was as
effective as naproxen, and the 2 dosage schedules of etodolac were co
mparable. The 2nd study compared etodolac 400 mg bid (86 patients) wit
h naproxen 500 bid (82 patients) and placebo (86 patients). Etodolac w
as again found to be as effective as naproxen. The 3rd study compared
etodolac 400 mg bid (91 patients) with nabumetone 1500 mg/day (89 pati
ents) and placebo (90 patients). The results indicated that the effica
cy of etodoiac was comparable to that of nabumetone and resulted in si
gnificantly better scores at endpoint on the investigator's overall as
sessment and patient's global assessment. In all 3 studies there were
no significant differences among the groups in the frequency of study
events or premature discontinuations as a result of study events. The
most common adverse event was digestive system disturbance, which was
mild to moderate in severity. The results of these studies confirm the
efficacy and safety of etodolac in managing the signs and symptoms of
OA.