Gh. Zalzal et al., IDEAL TIMING OF PEDIATRIC LARYNGOTRACHEAL RECONSTRUCTION, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 123(2), 1997, pp. 206-208
Objective: To determine whether there is an ideal age at which to perf
orm a laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) in the pediatric population
. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary care chil
dren's hospital. Patients: Forty-eight patients aged 48 months or youn
ger with laryngotracheal stenosis who underwent 50 LTRs from October 1
, 1986, to June 30, 1995. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1
, aged 8 through 24 months (22 patients); group 2, aged 25 through 48
months (26 patients). Intervention: Endoscopy and LTR. Main Outcome Me
asures: Successful decannulation. Results: Statistical analysis showed
that (I) patients in group 2 had more severe degree of laryngotrachea
l stenosis as determined by duration of stenting with no difference in
multiple sites of stenosis or type of repair required to correct lary
ngotracheal stenosis and (2) patients in group 2 were more likely to h
ave successful decannulation. Conclusion: Laryngotracheal reconstructi
on at a younger age (<25 months) is important for a child's speech and
language development as well as for eliminating the morbidity and mor
tality associated with a tracheotomy. However, LTR at a younger age is
associated with a higher risk of failure despite lesser degree of pat
hology. Therefore, although we still recommend LTR at a younger age si
nce it may be beneficial for a child's speech and language development
and avoidance of tracheotomy complications, this recommendation may b
e at the price of LTR failure and requirement far revision procedures.