Re. Nicholson et al., FACTORS INVOLVED IN LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM MANDIBULAR PLATE EXPOSURE, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 123(2), 1997, pp. 217-222
Objectives: To evaluate and to compare rates and timing of exposure of
alloplastic mandibular plates by plate type and tissue reconstruction
technique. Design: A retrospective review series of 92 consecutive pa
tients for 4 years (mean follow-up, 30 months). Setting: National Canc
er institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in a freestanding
cancer hospital. Patients: Seventy-nine patients received alloplastic
mandibular plates for segmental defects, and 13 patients received comp
ression plates for mandibular osteotomies following ablative cancer su
rgery, including 21 titanium hollow osseointegrating reconstruction, 4
1 Storz, 16 Synthes, and 5 AO/ASIF (Arbeitsgemein schott fur Ostcosynt
hese fragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation) plates. Pr
imary flap repair was provided by 71 pedicled soft tissue and 19 osseo
cutaneous free flaps, with primary closure in the remaining 2. Interve
ntion: Most of the reconstructions of the mandibular defect was with a
n alloplastic plate with musculocutaneous flap or revascularized bone
graft. Outcome Measures: Clinically apparent intraoral or extraoral pl
ate exposure. Results: Plate exposure occurred in 25 cases. Nine plate
s were exposed extraorally, at a mean postoperative interval of 40 wee
ks. The remaining 16 plates were exposed intraorally at a mean postope
rative interval of 16 weeks. There was no significant difference in th
e exposure rates of different plate types or methods of reconstruction
. The titanium hollow osseointegrating reconstruction plate had a simi
lar exposure rate compared with the other plates. Size and site of the
defect were the only significant predictors of plate exposure. Radiot
herapy and postoperative complications did not affect the rate of expo
sure. Conclusions: Extraoral plate exposure occurs less commonly and l
ater in the postoperative period than intraoral exposure, suggesting d
ifferent causes. Plate type and type of flap reconstruction do not aff
ect the rate of exposure. This may reflect long follow-up.