A theoretical model is proposed explaining why repression sometimes de
ters and sometimes instigates political action. Then this model is app
lied to explain the mounting protests in East Germany in 1989. The bas
ic idea of the model is that repression, as a cost, has a direct deter
ring effect on political action, but that increasing repression instig
ates positive incentives up to a certain point; then positive incentiv
es decrease-a relationship corresponding to an inverted u-curve. Apart
from repression, public goods incentives (discontent, weighted by per
ceived political influence), moral incentives, and social incentives h
ave positive effects on participation in protest. A representative sur
vey of 1,300 citizens from Leipzig (East Germany) conducted in the fal
l of 1990, focusing on the events of the East German revolution in 198
9, confirms the model with two exceptions: Increasing probability of r
epression raises protest, but the increase becomes smaller with increa
sing probability of repression (decreasing radicalization effect); inc
reasing costs of repression lowers protest, but the decrease becomes s
maller with increasing costs of repression (decreasing deterrence effe
ct). It is argued that the protests in East Germany could emerge despi
te severe repression because positive incentives to protest increased
due to political events.