C. Arvanitakis et al., CISAPRIDE AND RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE - A COMPARATIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 7(6), 1993, pp. 635-641
Forty patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and oesophagitis
, documented by endoscopy (grades I to III by the Savary-Miller classi
fication) were randomized to participate in a comparative double-blind
trial to receive cisapride (10 mg q.d.s.) or ranitidine (150 mg b.d.)
for an 8-week period. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed
immediately before the entry to the trial and after the 8-week period
at the completion of the trial. The evaluable cohort included 3 7 pati
ents who completed the trial, 1 8 in the cisapride group and 19 in the
ranitidine group. Three patients were withdrawn from the trial; one o
n ranitidine developed severe anaphylactic reaction, one on cisapride
severe dizziness and one on cisapride did not wish to continue on the
trial. The results of the trial, regarding symptomatic and endoscopic
improvement were comparable in the two groups. Both drugs were effecti
ve in controlling symptoms, such as acid regurgitation, retrosternal p
ain, retrosternal burning, epigastric fullness and discomfort (pain, b
urning, sense of pressure) and resulted in endoscopic healing of oesop
hagitis. With few exceptions, symptoms remained in remission 1 month a
fter treatment in the majority of patients. Globally, both drugs were
tolerated comparably, and adverse effects other than those which resul
ted in the withdrawal from the trial were minimal in both groups. The
results of this trial indicate that cisapride and ranitidine, although
of different pharmacological action, are comparable in their therapeu
tic effect in symptomatic improvement and endoscopic healing in patien
ts with mild to moderate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.