This article examines how consumer evaluations of multiple price chang
es differ from the evaluation of a single price change of an equal amo
unt. Consistent with R. Thaler's theory about segregation versus integ
ration of gains and losses, we find that multiple price decreases are
evaluated more favorably than a single price decrease and multiple pri
ce increases are evaluated more unfavorably than a single price increa
se. However, these effects are moderated by consumer price uncertainty
and relative magnitude of the prices being evaluated. Because price-u
ncertain consumers consider higher ranges of prices acceptable, they a
re less unfavorable to multiple price increases and more favorable to
multiple price decreases than certain consumers. Moreover, when the ma
gnitude of one price is very small relative to other prices, consumers
' preference for multiple price decreases (relative to a single price
decrease) is reduced. However, this effect is not found when there are
price increases.