COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE DISEASE

Citation
Ar. Mattia et al., COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE DISEASE, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 12(11), 1993, pp. 882-886
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Microbiology
ISSN journal
09349723
Volume
12
Issue
11
Year of publication
1993
Pages
882 - 886
Database
ISI
SICI code
0934-9723(1993)12:11<882:CO4MIT>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Nine hundred forty-five stool specimens from patients suspected of hav ing,ing Clostridium difficile disease were examined using a cell cultu re cytotoxicity assay (CTA), two enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits (Cytocl one for toxins A and B; VIDAS for toxin A) and a latex agglutination a ssay (CDT). One hundred nineteen specimens had positive titers (greate r than or equal to 90) in the CTA; clinical review of 16 discordant sa mples and 49 controls supported the significance of 90 as the positive cut-off titer. The performance of the two EIAs and the latex assay wa s assessed relative to CTA titers of the samples. Sensitivity was less than or equal to 50% for all three assays for the 24 specimens with C TA titers of 90, but it reached 97-100% for the two EIAs and 84% for t he latex assay at titers of greater than or equal to 2,250. The Cytocl one EIA exhibited higher sensitivity at the lower positive titers. Ove rall, specificity of the methods ranged from 96.7% (CDT latex assay)to 99.1% (Cytoclone EIA).