Ar. Mattia et al., COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE DISEASE, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 12(11), 1993, pp. 882-886
Nine hundred forty-five stool specimens from patients suspected of hav
ing,ing Clostridium difficile disease were examined using a cell cultu
re cytotoxicity assay (CTA), two enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits (Cytocl
one for toxins A and B; VIDAS for toxin A) and a latex agglutination a
ssay (CDT). One hundred nineteen specimens had positive titers (greate
r than or equal to 90) in the CTA; clinical review of 16 discordant sa
mples and 49 controls supported the significance of 90 as the positive
cut-off titer. The performance of the two EIAs and the latex assay wa
s assessed relative to CTA titers of the samples. Sensitivity was less
than or equal to 50% for all three assays for the 24 specimens with C
TA titers of 90, but it reached 97-100% for the two EIAs and 84% for t
he latex assay at titers of greater than or equal to 2,250. The Cytocl
one EIA exhibited higher sensitivity at the lower positive titers. Ove
rall, specificity of the methods ranged from 96.7% (CDT latex assay)to
99.1% (Cytoclone EIA).