Fl. Kitterle et al., HEMISPHERIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE INTERFERENCE AMONG COMPONENTS OF COMPOUND GRATINGS, Perception & psychophysics, 54(6), 1993, pp. 785-793
The relationship between local/global and high/low spatial-frequency p
rocessing in hemispheric asymmetries was explored. Subjects were requi
red to judge the orientation of a high- or low-spatial-frequency compo
nent of a compound grating presented in the left visual field (LVF) or
right visual field (RVF). In Experiment 1, attention was focused on o
ne or the other component. A signal detection analysis indicated that
sensitivity (d') to the high-spatial-frequency target was reduced more
by the presence of the low-spatial-frequency component when both were
presented in the LVF rather than in the RVF. In Experiment 2, subject
s determined whether a target orientation was present, independent of
spatial frequency at only a single level (i.e., at the high- or low-sp
atial-frequency level), as opposed to both or neither level. An RVF/LH
(left hemisphere) advantage was found when the decision was based on
the orientation of the high-frequency component. The asymmetrical infl
uence of visual field of presentation and spatial frequency upon sensi
tivity is discussed in terms of hemispheric differences in the magnitu
de of inhibition between spatial-frequency channels and in the role of
transient channel activity to capture and direct higher order attenti
onal processes.