Ab. Vanvugt et al., OSTEOSYNTHESIS VERSUS ENDOPROSTHESIS IN THE TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE INTRACAPSULAR HIP-FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL, Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 113(1), 1993, pp. 39-45
Forty-three elderly patients with an intracapsular hip fracture were s
elected for a prospective randomised trial comparing osteosynthesis (D
HS) versus primary hemiarthroplasty (HA) with a 3-year follow-up. The
duration of the operation and the perioperative blood loss were signif
icantly shorter in DHS, but inadequate reduction and/or fixation led t
o serious problems in this group. Clinical morbidity was lower after D
HS. No difference could be demonstrated in the mortality rates, fractu
re- or operation-related complications or the need for secondary inter
vention. Reintervention could be carried out without additional risk i
n both groups and did not lead to poor end results. Comparable results
were obtained with both methods up to 24 months. At the 36-month foll
ow-up, a significantly worse outcome could be demonstrated in the HA g
roup. We conclude that osteosynthesis is justified as the primary trea
tment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in elderly patients. En
doprosthetic replacement can be safely used in cases where osteosynthe
sis has failed.