Over half of all bills introduced in the U.S. Congress are cosponsored
, and, while many observers assume that cosponsorship is crucial to th
e legislative process, few have analyzed what it means. We view cospon
sorship as a signal about the content of legislation and ask whether i
t is a meaningful signal for members. Specifically we focus on whether
cosponsorship influences a bill's passage. Three types of signals are
considered: bandwagon, ideological, and expertise. Using data drawn f
rom the 99th Congress, we analyze 8,002 House and Senate bills. Our fi
ndings show that cosponsorship is common. However, they also show that
it is an overrated cue. At best it provides a signal concerning exper
tise at the outset of the legislative process, but generates a very we
ak signal thereafter. In short, cosponsorship has become a routine and
rarely effective aspect of the legislative landscape.