B. Singh et Tj. Maharaj, RADICAL MASTOIDECTOMY - ITS PLACE IN OTITIC INTRACRANIAL COMPLICATIONS, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 107(12), 1993, pp. 1113-1118
Standard recommended treatment for patients with intracranial complica
tions from otitis media, has been radical mastoidectomy, whether chole
steatoma is present or not. This was established in the pre-antibiotic
era to improve survival. Over a six-year period, from January 1985 to
December 1990, 268 patients were admitted with intracranial and extra
cranial complications of otitis media. The prospective treatment consi
sted of antibiotics and surgery. Surgery entailed mastoidectomy and dr
ainage of intracranial collections of pus in all patients. However, pr
ospectively in these patients the ear pathology and not the complicati
on dictated the type of mastoidectomy performed. Cortical mastoidectom
y was performed in non-cholesteatomatous ears and radical mastoidectom
y in cholesteatomatous ears. Recurrence of intracranial complications
occurred in only four patients (two per cent), a temporal lobe cerebri
tis in the non-cholesteatomatous ear group, and, a temporal lobe absce
ss, posterior fossa abscess and subdural empyema in the cholesteatomat
ous ear group. The temporal lobe cerebritis settled on intravenous ant
ibiotics whilst the temporal lobe abscess, posterior fossa abscess and
subdural empyema required redrainage. In none of these was the ear su
rgery revised. There were 15 deaths (eight per cent), all occurring in
patients with intracranial complications, 12 associated with brain ab
scess, two with subdural empyema and one with meningitis. Eight were f
rom the non-cholesteatomatous group and seven from the cholesteatomato
us group. The mortality was directly related to the patients conscious
ness level on admission and not to the type of ear pathology. It can t
herefore be concluded that radical mastoidectomy is unwarranted in the
non-cholesteatomatous ear, even with an otogenic intracranial complic
ation.