BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION AND ITS IMPACT ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINSDURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Citation
Ca. Gomez et al., BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION AND ITS IMPACT ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINSDURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, Urology, 42(6), 1993, pp. 689-693
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00904295
Volume
42
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
689 - 693
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-4295(1993)42:6<689:BNPAII>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastom otic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 pa tients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissec tion and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis t o the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patien ts (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bla dder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients ar e fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the like lihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential muc osa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruc tion.