Kg. Danielsson et al., EFFECT OF LOW DAILY DOSES OF MIFEPRISTONE ON OVARIAN-FUNCTION AND ENDOMETRIAL DEVELOPMENT, Human reproduction, 12(1), 1997, pp. 124-131
The effects of low daily doses of the antiprogestin mifepristone (RU 4
86) on ovarian and endometrial function were studied. The study includ
ed one control cycle, three treatment cycles and one follow-up cycle.
During the treatment cycles, either 0.1 (n = 5) or 0.5 (n = 5) mg of m
ifepristone was administered once daily. Urine samples were collected
three times weekly during the control and treatment cycles and pregnan
ediol glucuronide and oestrone glucuronide and luteinizing hormone (LI
) were quantified by radioimmunoassay. Blood samples for cortisol meas
urement were collected once weekly and for serum glycodelin at the ons
et of menstruation. An endometrial biopsy was obtained in the mid-lute
al phase in the control cycle and in the first and third treatment cyc
les and analysed by morphometric and histochemical methods. Binding of
Dolichus biflorus agglutinin (DBA) lectin was measured and expression
of progesterone and oestrogen receptors and glycodelin were analysed
immunohistochemically. All cycles studied were ovulatory with an LH pe
ak and elevated pregnanediol glucuronide concentrations. Follicular de
velopment seemed normal as judged by ultrasound examination. The lengt
h of the menstrual cycle and the menstrual bleeding were not significa
ntly altered. Following administration of 0.5 mg mifepristone/day, end
ometrial development appeared to be slightly retarded and glandular di
ameter was significantly reduced. Furthermore, significant decreases i
n DBA lectin binding and endometrial expression of glycodelin were obs
erved. Daily doses of 0.1 mg did not have any significant effect on th
e endometrium. No differences in oestrogen or progesterone receptor im
munoactivity between control and treatment cycles mere seen. This stud
y provides further evidence that endometrial function is sensitive eve
n to doses of antiprogestin that are low enough not to disturb ovulati
on. It remains to be established whether these effects are sufficient
to prevent implantation.