Re. Coleman et al., LABORATORY AND FIELD TRIALS OF 4 REPELLENTS WITH CULEX-PIPIENS (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE), Journal of medical entomology, 31(1), 1994, pp. 17-22
During Operation ''Desert Shield,'' 16 volunteers field-tested four in
sect repellents (deet, the lactone CIC-4, and the piperidine compounds
AI3-37220 and AI3-35765 against biting mosquitoes at King Fahd Airpor
t, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. CIC4 and AI3-37220 (25% wt/vol) pro
vided effective (>90%) protection against bites for 4 h. Deet and AI3-
35765 protected for only 2 h. The compounds subsequently were evaluate
d for repellency against laboratory-reared Culex pipiens L. CIC-4 was
more effective than deet, AI3-37220, or AI3-35765 at the ED50 but not
at the ED95 level in initial sensitivity tests using human volunteers.
At the ED95 level, deet provided significantly better protection than
either piperidine compound. In laboratory duration tests, AI3-37220 p
rovided 8 h of effective (>90%) protection against Cx. pipiens bites,
deet and AI3-35765 7 h of protection, and CIC-4 2 h of protection.