This article argues that rent-seeking competition over tax reform can
prospective efficiency gains, thus making tax reform a potential negat
ive-sum activity-especially when considered over the entire rent-seeki
ng cycle. It concludes that a positive defense against negative-sum ta
x reform games can arise from public choice economists debunking the g
ame's ideological basis and constructing ''rent-seeking impact stateme
nts'' for proposed tax reforms.