RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT IN EVALUATION OF THE NUTRITIONAL-STATUS OF SURGICAL PATIENTS

Citation
L. Lupo et al., RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT IN EVALUATION OF THE NUTRITIONAL-STATUS OF SURGICAL PATIENTS, British Journal of Surgery, 80(12), 1993, pp. 1553-1556
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071323
Volume
80
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1553 - 1556
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1323(1993)80:12<1553:ROCJIE>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The ability of surgeons to make a reproducible and reliable evaluation of the nutritional status of patients was assessed. Three independent observers assigned 64 patients to one of four nutritional states - no rmal nourishment, and mild, moderate and severe malnutrition - using a questionnaire and clinical examination. Interobserver variability was analysed using the re statistic and reliability by assessing the corr elation between the assigned class and total serum protein, haemoglobi n, albumin, transferrin and cholesterol levels, weight loss and the re sults of immunological skin rests. Concordance was observed in 49 of t he 64 judgements (77 per cent) and partial agreement in the remainder (kappa=0.74, P<0.001). Clinical judgement correlated significantly wit h albumin, transferrin and cholesterol levels and weight loss (R(2)=0. 73, P<0.001). Surgeons are able to assess nutritional status using cli nical judgement.