In spite of an experience of almost 50 years of use of antithyroid dru
gs and radioiodine for the treatment of Graves' disease, the rationale
for choice is often obscure. Early reports of high remission rates du
ring thiourea therapy were followed by less optimistic ones, which alo
ng with other factors may have fueled the current major shift toward u
se of radioiodine. This review examines whether or not the use of anti
thyroid drugs indeed may have become obsolete. The intrathyroidal and
extrathyroidal mechanisms of action of the drugs are reviewed with emp
hasis on their potential immunosuppressive effects. The latter may inv
olve a direct effect on thyroid follicular cells, a direct suppression
of TSH receptor antibody formation, or indirect effects mediated via
heat shock proteins, oxygen free radicals, and the immune system. Pote
ntial factors associated with success or failure with antithyroid drug
therapy are discussed, such as the effects of dose and duration of tr
eatment, iodine milieu, and concomitant L-thyroxine therapy. The risks
inherent to radioiodine therapy are only briefly described with empha
sis on the possible aggravation by radioiodine of preexistent ophthalm
opathy. The reader must decide whether the evidence marshalled convinc
ingly indicates that the use of the thiourea compounds should be aband
oned. The author thinks not, and is optimistic that imminent discovery
of the yet elusive and enigmatic pathogenesis of Graves' disease will
permit new and innovative treatment or more effective use of currentl
y available therapies.