Jw. Sanders et al., EVALUATION OF AN ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN URINE OF ASYMPTOMATIC MEN, Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(1), 1994, pp. 24-27
In a study of 1,486 men attending two sexually transmitted disease cli
nics, of whom 891 had no symptoms of urethritis, we compared an enzyme
immunoassay (EIA) (Baxter-Bartels, formerly Northumbria AntigEnz) of
urine sediment to urethral culture for the detection of Chlamydia trac
homatis. C. trachomatis prevalence by culture alone was 7.7% in asympt
omatic men and 10.9% in symptomatic men. Discrepant results between EI
A of urine and urethral culture were evaluated by direct fluorescent-a
ntibody staining (DFA) for elementary bodies in urine sediment or in c
ulture transport media. When chlamydial infection was defined as eithe
r a positive urethral culture or positive EIA confirmed by DFA, chlamy
dia prevalence increased to 8.9% in asymptomatic men and 11.6% in symp
tomatic men. The urine EIA sensitivity, specificity, and positive and
negative predictive values for chlamydia detection in asymptomatic men
were 84.8, 99.3, 91.8, and 98.5%, respectively, with nearly identical
results for symptomatic men. The sensitivities of urethral culture al
one compared with the combination of urethral culture and urine EIA (w
ith DFA confirmation) were 87.3 and 94.3% for asymptomatic and symptom
atic men, respectively. The present EIA of urine sediment is both high
ly sensitive and specific for the detection of C. trachomatis in asymp
tomatic men, thus providing a noninvasive screening method for chlamyd
ia infection in asymptomatic men attending sexually transmitted diseas
e clinics.