A response-adaptive treatment allocation design for a clinical trial a
ttempts to place the majority of patients on the treatment that appear
s more successful, based on the responses of patients already treated.
One example of such a design is the randomized play-the-winner rule d
eveloped by Wei and Durham, which randomizes the treatment assignment
probabilities according to the outcomes of treatments previously assig
ned. For a trial with dichotomous treatment responses and a randomized
play-the-winner assignment scheme, exact small sample permutation tes
ts of the hypothesis of equal treatment effects and large sample tests
based on a population model have previously been developed. We presen
t a large sample permutation test statistic for this case; under certa
in conditions on the sequence of responses, the test statistic is show
n to be asymptotically normal. For a trial with a continuous response
variable, we develop a rank-based analog of the randomized play-the-wi
nner assignment scheme. Simulation evidence in both cases suggests tha
t a normal approximation to the test statistic works well for moderate
-sized trials, with some conservatism in the extreme tails.