Mg. Yates et al., SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS, INVERTEBRATE DENSITIES AND SHOREBIRD DENSITIES ON THE INNER BANKS OF THE WASH, Journal of Applied Ecology, 30(4), 1993, pp. 599-614
1. This paper tests the possibility that, primarily through their effe
ct on invertebrate prey densities, sediment characteristics can be use
d to predict the densities of shorebirds (Charadrii), on the inner ban
ks of the Wash, east England. 192 quadrats were established with, on m
ost shores, a transect of nine quadrats from the marsh edge to the Low
Water Mark (LWM). Shorebirds were counted in winter in each quadrat.
The densities of the main invertebrate prey species were sampled in ea
rly winter/late autumn at the mid-point of each quadrat, together with
the sediment particle size and organic content. The time for which ea
ch quadrat was inundated over high water spring tides was also measure
d. 2. Regression analyses revealed that the densities of each of the e
ight shorebird species were related to the densities of several of the
ir known, or suspected, prey species. A similar analysis showed that t
he densities of most prey species were, in turn, related to the propor
tion of one or more of the four sediment particle size categories in t
he substrate; coarse sand, fine sand; silt and clay. The densities of
most invertebrates were also related to inundation time, with most rel
ationships being strongly non-linear. 3. In most cases, the effect of
prey density on bird density remained significant when the sediment ch
aracteristics and inundation time, together with a measure of a quadra
t's distance from the LWM, were added to the regression analysis of va
riations in bird densities. In a few cases, one component of the sedim
ent particle size distribution additionally affected bird density. On
the west and south-west sides of the Wash in particular, the densities
of several shorebirds were also markedly higher in quadrats close to
the LWM, even with the effect of both prey density and sediment partic
le size taken into account. The results were largely consistent, howev
er, with the hypothesis that the main factors determining spatial vari
ations in bird densities were variations in prey densities. 4. It was
concluded that, because of the strong influence of the sediment on the
densities of most prey species, and because the model was based on tr
ansects which spanned the whole width of the shore so that the tidal i
nundation time was comparable in each, the sediment particle size dist
ribution could be used to predict shorebird densities directly. It was
not necessary first to predict the densities of the invertebrates on
which they feed.