F. Giffin et A. Greenough, EFFECT OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE AND MEAN AIRWAY PRESSURE ON RESPIRATORY COMPLIANCE AND GAS-EXCHANGE IN CHILDREN WITH LIVER-DISEASE, European journal of pediatrics, 153(1), 1994, pp. 28-33
The effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and mean airway
pressure (MAP) on respiratory compliance and gas exchange was assessed
in children with liver disease. In the first study of 12 patients, PE
EP was decreased either by 3 cmH(2)O below the baseline level (the chi
ld's original level) or to O cmH(2)O and then increased to 3 cmH(2)O a
bove the baseline. Decreasing PEEP impaired compliance (P < 0.01), and
oxygenation (P < 0.05), whereas increasing PEEP improved compliance (
P < 0.05) and oxygenation (P < 0.05). Neither increasing nor decreasin
g PEEP caused significant changes in the carbon dioxide levels. In the
second study, 24 children were studied at their baseline settings and
then after increasing the PEEP by 3 cmH(2)O while simultaneously lowe
ring the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) to maintain MAP constant (12
children had lung function measurements). In the group overall increas
ing PEEP while decreasing PIP resulted in an insignificant change in p
(a)O(2), but a significant increase p(a)CO(2) (P < 0.01) and reduction
in tidal volume (P < 0.01), the change in compliance was not signific
ant. After a second period at the baseline settings, in 12 children in
spiratory time (T-I) was increased while keeping MAP constant by reduc
ing PIP, No significant change in p(a)O(2) or compliance was experienc
ed, but p(a)CO(2) increased (P < 0.05) and tidal volume decreased (P <
0.01). In the other 12 children MAP was increased by prolonging T-I,
Increasing MAP had a variable effect and the changes in p(a)O(2) and p
(a)CO(2) were not significant. No critical MAP level with regard to ox
ygenation was demonstrated. We conclude that in children with liver di
sease, increasing PEEP can improve oxygenation and compliance, but the
MAP level alone does not determine oxygenation.